I need a very high res picture of A Booth asap. If anyone out there has such, send it to me at mhaykin@sbts.edu.
Many thanks in advance!
Your Custom Text Here
I need a very high res picture of A Booth asap. If anyone out there has such, send it to me at mhaykin@sbts.edu.
Many thanks in advance!
Love this paragraph by Andrew Fuller describing his close friend Samuel Pearce: "In many persons the pleasures imparted by religion are counteracted by a gloomy constitution: but it was not so in him. In his disposition they met with a friendly soul. Cheerfulness was as natural to him as breathing; and this spirit, sanctified by the grace of God, gave a tincture to all his thoughts, conversation, and preaching. He was seldom heard without tears; but they were frequently tears of pleasure. No levity, no attempts at wit, no aiming to excite the risibility of an audience, ever disgraced his sermons. Religion in him was habitual seriousness, mingled with sacred pleasure, frequently rising into sublime delight, and occasionally overflowing with transporting joy."
May God forgive those brethren have so lived that Christianity appeared to be a thing of gloom and doom!
The writing of advertising blurbs has a long, interesting history that goes back well into the 18th century. This is not the place to enter into that. But I did recently come across the following fascinating blurb by Lyman Beecher (1775–1863)—all of whose seven sons entered the ministry, including the famous Henry Ward Beecher (there is a new bio of him that I need to read), and whose daughter, Harriet Beecher Stowe, wrote Uncle Tom’s Cabin—the friend of Asahel Nettleton and an Edwardsean divine. It comes on page 8 of the ads at the back of James D. Knowles, Memoir of Mrs. Ann H. Judson (10th ed.; Boston: Gould, Kendall, & Lincoln, 1838) and is Beecher’s recommendatory blurb for Gould, Kendall & Lincoln’s two-vol. edition of the Works of Andrew Fuller. This Boston publishing house had published Fuller’s corpus in “two large octavo volumes on fair type and fine paper” at a cost below former editions, which were selling for $14 US (then!).
Beecher was thrilled to lend his name to the selling of this work. As he wrote—and note his linking of Fuller’s name with that of Jonathan Edwards:
“Gentlemen:—I cheerfully accord the testimony of my high approbation to the Works of Andrew Fuller. He is one of the few great, original, and holy men, whom God occasionally raises up to dispel the mists which gather about the truth, and bring out the unobscured illumination of the Word of God. No human mind has ever been unerring in all its expositions of revealed truth; but Edwards and Fuller have comprehended, in my opinion, both the letter and spirit of the Bible in an eminent degree. With both I have been deeply conversant, from the commencement of my ministry to the present day, and have uniformly and earnestly recommended to theological students and young ministers, to imbue their minds with their heavenly dispositions, to acquire their habits of accurate definition and discrimination, while they possess themselves of their judicious opinions and powerful arguments. A better service for the truth, to the present day, can scarcely be done, than by the extensive circulation of the Works of Andrew Fuller. May it please the Lord to give you great success in the enterprise.”
There was a good reason that Martin Luther argued that a true theologian is formed by oratio and meditatio and tentatio, that is, prayer, meditation, and temptation/spiritual conflict. Student of theology: have you enrolled in this school?
Through the editing of Samuel Pearce's Memoirs I have discovered a work of Pearce I had completely overlooked hitherto: the circular letter of the Midland Association for 1794. Not sure why I have never known of this before. It is listed in Starr, but it seems I never really noticed it! Maybe the reason is in the fact that Pearce wrote the Association Letter for 1795, often reprinted on the sovereignty of God. I guess I thought he would not have written the letter two years running. How dimwitted this historian sometimes is!
When Andrew Fuller heard of Samuel Pearce's death, he was on a street in Scotland. He had to turn aside into an alleyway and weep. Reading the story of Pearce afresh: the wound is still there.
This week I hope to finish the critical edition of Fuller's memoir of Pearce. May the brokenness of the author at the death of his friend be again a blessing to the people of God.
All who desire to walk in Christ will suffer persecution and know the cross. How true this is! Yet, how rarely discussed. What do we really know about dying with Christ? We who are Baptists should know more about this than we really do. After all, baptism is a dying with Christ, is it not? And is not baptism the doorway into the Church, the community of suffering?
But our churches have become adept at hiding: hiding behind liturgy, behind tradition, behind doctrine! Afraid to really build into each other's lives in case we encounter suffering, we continue to meet weekly, but so much of it is merely show and sham. Inwardly there is pain, but people are afraid to ask and probe. And if something is said, how easily do the words stay only in the realm of the theoretic.
Personally, I am fed up with all such subterfuge! I did not become a follower of Christ and join his people to make-believe at Church. Either this Way is real or it is not!
I once thought that if we could get the doctrine right and the polity right, then true church would follow. How silly could I have been! Of course, doctrine is vital and polity is essential. But there is something more needed: the Spirit of the Crucified One and a people ready to let him take them up like the mountain like Isaac was taken by Abraham.
This is why I love the stories from the Church of Christian friends who knew the joy of suffering together for Christ. Such stories are balm to my spirit when it is in turmoil and rent with pain.
Why should Baptists care about the vile mess of US Episcopalianism? Because our forebears came out of that denomination and our arguments for Baptist polity were shaped in fighting Episcopalians (like the Quakers and Methodists and Congregationalists). And as Baptists we have a tradition: a tradition that involves in part arguments within and without. And some of the arguments in the 17th c were with the Anglicans outside of our forebears’ communities.
Nor can we stand back and gloat about the Episcopalian loss of gospel witness: it should make us WEEP! Think of the worthies in that Body: Cranmer, Hooper, Ridley, Latimer, Richard Greenham (that fount of Puritan pastoral theology), Perkins, holy Sibbes, Gurnall, the Wesleys, Romaine, the Venns, Newton (the mentor of one of my favourite Baptists, John Ryland Jr.), Whitefield, the holy John Fletcher, Grimshaw (my hero who was such a help to my Baptist forebear John Fawcett), Samuel Walker, George Thomson, William Cowper, Octavius Winslow (he became an Anglican after years as a Baptist! This is an historical mystery that needs unravelling), Simeon, Ryle. What we owe the Anglicans!
God have mercy on the denomination now! And God keep us from travelling the same path: much of their episcopal leadership has degraded the Lord Jesus and he has degraded them!
The full schedule for the conference on Baptist Spirituality to be held on August 24-25 on the campus of Southern Seminary has now been posted online.
This past week I received in the mail from a friend, Dr Curt Daniel, a copy of Arthur Henry Kirkby’s 1956 PhD thesis, “The Theology of Andrew Fuller and its Relation to Calvinism” (University of Edinburgh). Of course, I had heard of this thesis but never seen it. The impression I had been given of it was that the work was second-rate. I probably derived this impression from the articles of E.F. Clipsham, “Andrew Fuller and Fullerism: A Study in Evangelical Calvinism.” The Baptist Quarterly 20 (1963-64).
But let me go on record and say that the work is excellent and well executed. Have read to page 143 or so and Kirkby ably sustains his argument that Fuller was a Calvinist of the stamp of the great Reformer. I would not follow Kirkby in his depreciation of the influence of Edwards on Fuller, but am so glad to have this work.
I am deeply in your debt, Curt. Thank you.
The Hill - the online home for news from Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary posted a story about SWBTS's own Dr. Malcolm Yarnell's participation in our upcoming conference on Baptist Spirituality. The story actually highlights the dialogue between Drs. Yarnell and Haykin that is scheduled to take place at 9:00 pm following the conference's session on Tuesday, August 25th. The origins and details of the event are included in the article from The Hill posted below:
FORT WORTH, Texas (SWBTS) – Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary professor Malcolm Yarnell will join Southern Baptist Theological Seminary professor Michael A.G. Haykin in a dialogue about the strengths and weaknesses of the Reformed and Anabaptist traditions, Aug. 25.This dialogue originated when Yarnell and Haykin posted a charitable interaction on the subject of the Reformed and Anabaptist traditions on Twitter, a social networking Web site. According to Steve Weaver, Haykin’s research and administrative assistant, their interaction “exemplified the kind of frank and humble dialogue that needs to take place between those Baptists who might identify more with either the Reformed or the Anabaptist traditions.” Weaver posted their interaction from Twitter and announced the upcoming dialogue on http://www.andrewfullercenter.org/2009/07/the-kind-of-dialogue-we-need.
Alongside his role as associate professor of systematic theology, Yarnell serves as the director of Southwestern’s Oxford Study Program and of its Center for Theological Research. He is also editor of the Southwestern Journal of Theology. Haykin serves as professor of Church History and Biblical Spirituality at Southern Seminary, and he is director of the Andrew Fuller Center for Baptist Studies.
Their dialogue begins at 9:00 p.m. and is open to the public without charge at The Andrew Fuller Center for Baptist Studies at Southern Seminary. The dialogue will follow a conference at the Fuller Center, titled “Baptist Spirituality: Historical Perspectives.” The conference will feature several speakers, including Yarnell.
For more information on the conference, visit the following link from the Fuller Center’s Web site: http://andrewfullercenter.org/conference/baptist-spirituality-historical-perspectives-august-24-25-2009.
Earlier this week Jon Bloom posted on the Desiring God blog a recommendation of Dr. Haykin's recent booklet, In God We Trust: What Is God Saying In The Midst Of This Financial Crisis.
This morning I read a booklet by Michael Haykin of Southern Seminary titled, In God We Trust: What Is God Saying In The Midst Of This Financial Crisis. He provides a brief survey of historical financial crises, beginning with Paul’s collection for the Jerusalem saints up through the Great Depression and highlights the spiritual fruit that came from them.I love how he exhorts us Christians to be radically generous in the face of financial uncertainty since it is precisely during these times when our trust in God can be most clearly seen. . . .
The booklet can be read in 15-30 minutes and would be a helpful resource for families, congregations, Sunday schools, and small groups.
What to say about the DSS at the ROM (Toronto’s Royal Ontario Museum)?
Fabulous to see these remnants of a bygone piety, for that is what they are. A longing for community purity and Messiah. The display was well done, very professional. Not biased against biblical faith. I felt that biblical faith was taken seriously. The historical intro was comprehensive and gave you the setting for the DSS as well as the scholarly disagreement over the DSS: their meaning and provenance. Very helpful in that regard.
But I missed a full scroll of the DSS. What was on display were fragments. It also could have been very helpful to have an audio guide. Considering what we paid (28 dollars entry fee for adults with another five paid for a guidebook) I think a little more could have been provided. Also at the end were a collection of holy texts: the Torah, the Bible (plus NT) and the Quran. I was honestly not sure what Islam had to do with the DSS. Another example of PC run amok IMO.
There is a second installment coming in October and will probably see that if I can (it claims to have the oldest copy of the 10 commandments).
It is not well known, but the mother tongue of John Calvin was not French—which he learned later in life—but Picard, a Romance language still spoken today that is close to but distinct from French, for he was born in Noyon, Picardy, in north-eastern France.[1]
[1] Bruce Gordon, Calvin (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009), 4. For an overview of Picard, see “Picard language” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Picard_language; accessed July 4, 2009).
Last night a fascinating exchange occurred on, of all places, Twitter. I believe it exemplified the kind of frank and humble dialogue that needs to take place between those Baptists who might identify more with either the Reformed or the Anabaptist traditions. Both Dr. Haykin and Dr. Yarnell demonstrated the ability to recognize the flaws and strengths of the historical groups with whom they may identify more or less strongly. Take note at the end of the dialogue for a special announcement. Dr. Haykin:
@myarnell: last few days have been thinking much about Calvin's legacy: so much theol brilliance...but:
@myarnell: those who embrace his soteriological legacy must ask forgiveness from Anabaptist brothers. And why?
@myarnell. Because of his advocacy of the sword as a curb on heresy, esp Anabaptism in both its heretical and orthodox forms.
@myarnell: reading Eamon Duffy's recent revisionist history of Bloody Mary's reign has convinced me that some Protestant forebears erred.
@myarnell: they erred by being willing to use the sword to repress error. Like our 18th c forbears who were slave owners, they are flawed.
@myarnell: flawed models. But in so far as they followed Christ soteriologically they are safe guides. But their views of church & state:
@myarnell: the bottom line is still this: I am sorry that some of my Calv. forbears ever used the sword against Anab. brothers.
Dr. Yarnell:
@MAGHaykin Some brilliant thoughts here. Thank you for sharing them.
@MAGHaykin Shall we conclude that some of our Calvinist brothers have acceptable (though not necessarily always correct) soteriology?
@MAGHaykin And that our Anabaptist brothers perceived the doctrines of the church & the ordinances more clearly than our Calvinist brothers?
@MAGHaykin And, finally, that Calvin and the Calvinists were absolutely wrong when it came to the doctrine of religious persecution/liberty?
Dr. Haykin:
@myarnell: I think so: I am a Calvinist soteriologically but the ortho. Anab. saw more accurately NT church life.
@myarnell: And they were spot on re persecution. Calvin failed to reform the horrific legacy of relig persec from the Middle Ages.
Dr. Yarnell:
@MAGHaykin Don't tell anybody but I actually find much in Calvin that is brilliant too!
Steve Weaver:
Wow, great dialogue between @myarnell and @MAGHaykin! May I suggest an open late night discussion re these matters at the AFCBS conference?
Dr. Yarnell:
@steveweaver Some of the best theology is formed in dialogue, as 1 Cor 14 implies: Anabaptists called it Sittzenrecht or Lex Sedentium.
Dr. Haykin:
If Malcolm is up for it during the Fuller conference in August it would be great to do something re Calvin and the Anabaptists on state-ch.
Problem: is when to do it, we have full schedule. Maybe Wed morning if Malcolm can stay over.
@myarnell and @steveweaver: let me see if we can arrange a mid-morn event. Give me early next week. It would focus on Calvin & the Anabap.
Dr. Yarnell:
@MAGHaykin I have not made my flight plans yet so let me know if you want me through Wed morning.
Since this dialogue ended last night, both Dr. Haykin and Dr. Yarnell have agreed to a late night dialogue along these lines after Dr. Yarnell's presentation on Tuesday night at this year's AFCBS conference on Baptist Spirituality. This dialogue will be open to the Southern Seminary community and the general public and will hopefully model the way two people with differing perspectives on some matters can yet recognize the strengths and weaknesses of one another's positions.
When: Tuesday, August 25th at 9:00 pm
Where: TBD on the campus of Southern Seminary (probably Heritage Hall or the Legacy Center)
What: An open dialogue with Drs. Yarnell and Haykin on the relative strengths and weaknesses of the Reformed and Anabaptist traditions.
This event will be open and free of charge, but you can register for the conference on which this dialogue will piggy-back here. There is a great line-up of speakers, a Monday evening banquet meat and there will be several free books given away to those who register for the conference.
Over the last few days I have been thinking much about Calvin’s legacy: so much theological brilliance and so much to thank God for…but we who embrace his soteriological legacy also must ask forgiveness from our Anabaptist brothers. And why? Simply because of his advocacy of the sword as a curb on heresy, esp. his support of the repression of Anabaptism in both its heretical and orthodox forms. Reading Eamon Duffy’s recent revisionist history of the reign of Bloody Mary (Fires of Faith)—which I bought in Cork, S. Ireland when there a few weeks ago—has convinced me that some of my Protestant and Calvinist forebears erred greatly when they were willing to use the sword to repress error. Like our 18th c. forebears who were slave owners, they are flawed models. In so far as they followed Christ soteriologically they are safe guides. But with regard to the use of the state to repress error, we need to understand their views of church & state as an outcropping of the medieval Constantinian model.
The bottom line is still this: I am sorry that some of my Calvinist forebears ever used the sword against their—and my—Anabaptist brothers.
"Michael Haykin puts today's financial uncertainties in perspective with a helpful blend of historical and biblical insight. This is a tremendous word of encouragement for anyone seeking a sure anchor in these tumultuous times." John MacArthur "Difficult financial times remind us that we need to seek the true, eternal wealth that can't be corrupted by moth or rust - and doesn't evaporate when Wall Street has a setback. Michael Haykin points the way in this wonderfully encouraging, informative, and easy-to-read booklet." Phil Johnson
In God We Trust? is available from Audubon Press for $2.79 (30% off retail). You can order online or call toll-free 800-405-3788 (M-F 9:00-5:00).
Dr. Michael A.G. Haykin was recently interviewed by Paul Butler on Moody Radio's Prime Time America about the “Calvin for the 21st Century Conference” sponsored by the Puritan Reformed Theological Seminary in Grand Rapids, MI, August 27th – 29th. The part with Dr. Haykin begins at about the 1:50 mark.
My son Nigel graduated this evening from Highland High School in Dundas, Ontario. What a privilege to have such a son. What changes he has gone through in the past couple of years. I praise the Lord for giving me such a son.
Pray for him: he is a Christian and will be studying history and classics next year at McMaster University, following in the same academic pathway that his sister Victoria has trod.
Though he told me a year ago that the history of the eighteenth century was quite boring—he preferred Roman history at the time—he is currently fascinated with British imperialism, especially the American Revolution, Banastre Tarleton and James Cook.
One of the most poignant historical reflections that I have ever heard came from a dear friend named Bob Shaker, literary enthusiast extraordinaire and a one-time deacon of Jarvis Street Baptist Church. Bob happened to visit his pastor, T.T. Shields—who, though married twice, never had any physical children—in 1949, when many of those whom Shields had mentored and taught—great future Canadian Baptist leaders like Jack Scott, Hal MacBain, Arnold Dallimore, and Tom Carson (D.A. Carson’s father)—took a different ecclesiological position than Shields and a cleavage occurred between Shields and them. Without a doubt Shields contributed to the resulting division between these brothers in Christ, but he told Shaker sadly, “All of my children are leaving me.” How utterly sad! On the flip side, though, there are those words of the aged Apostle John in 3 John 4: “I have no greater joy than to hear that my children are walking in the truth.” It was with these Johannine words ringing in my ears that I read the following post by Baptist pastor John Bell, whom I have had the incredible privilege of teaching at Toronto Baptist Seminary (though I would never presume to think of Pastor Bell as a son in Christ--but I was so encouraged to read this): “Sharing the Gospel in the Gay Village” on Tim Challies’ blog.